Skip to main content

Blog entry by Kelly Fullwood

Fable 3 Is 10 Years Old Today, And I Wish More People Talked About It

Fable 3 Is 10 Years Old Today, And I Wish More People Talked About It

When Geralt finishes up in the realm and eventually leaves to go back to the real world, he is able to take some of the items that he collected with him. These items include the weapons and armor that were found inside of the Land of a Thousand Fab

As far as Fable games are concerned, Fable 3 has always been a bit of an ugly duckling. On one hand, it’s difficult to follow in the footsteps of a game as universally beloved as Fable 2. On the other, it’s especially brave to look at those footsteps stretched out in front of you and say, "Actually… I reckon I’ll walk the long way home."

I have been playing Genshin Impact for over a month and have yet to grow bored of the world it has to offer. It’s worth noting that this doesn’t mean I spend five hours a day wandering around Teyvat — often, I log in for 20 minutes or so just to box off my daily commissions and tackle a sidequest or two. I firmly believe that this is Genshin Impact’s greatest stren

Instead of murdering people in the middle of Bowerstone and growing big devilish horns, you had to manage a kingdom and decide whether it was more important to build a school or a brothel. This structure is excellently designed, mind, and went on to define similar systems in other games like Dragon Age: Inquisition. But the magic of Fable’s chaotic mayhem was rechanneled into something a bit more serious, a bit more grounded. While I vastly preferred the old versions of Fable, this wasn’t a bad thing. Fable games are anything if not ambitious, and once a game tries something new that’s genuinely worthwhile… well, I don’t care all that much if it’s not up my street — even failed experiments can help steer progress. Now that a new Fable game is confirmed to be in the works , I’m immensely glad that Fable 3 exists, because for as much stink as people talk about it, it’s a smart, audacious, and important game.

It is also the single best implementation of cause-and-effect relationships I have ever seen in a game. A lot of this has to do with the Pratchett-esque liveliness of the characters, but it can at least partially be attributed to how ambitious its long-term consequences are, too. You’re given a year to raise the arbitrary sum of 6.5 million gold, and you can do this by selling out allies, refusing to build hospitals, or working as a legitimate business owner in a cutthroat early capitalist industrial regime. No matter what you do, you’re going to be bitten in the arse somehow, which is always refreshingly real in the most tongue-in-cheek way possible.

If these people and monsters are sentient, then why haven't they yet figured out a way to leave the Land of a Thousand Fables and enter the real world? It can be assumed that since these creatures are technically illusions, they aren't conscious in the same way that most people in The Witcher universe are; however, this remains uncl

Although this occurrence canbe explained by the developers forgetting to take out the voice line when creating the unicorn, it still doesn't make any sense since most people wouldn't name a horse that they've just met and will only use for a few hours, let alone give it the exact same name as their horse that is waiting outs

However, that wasn't the only property that lent its hand in shaping Fable's tone and aesthetic. There was The Picture of Dorian Gray, where the idea of morality linking to appearance came from, Mad Max 2 (hence the focus on the dog in the second game), Kill Bill and Perfume: The Story of a Murderer.

There's a message board inside of the Land of a Thousand Fables that resemble the message boards that can be found in the real world very closely. The fact that this message board is so similar in size and shape to the one found in the main game doesn't make a lot of se

Whilst Dark Souls 2 tracked and displayed deaths to show the world how unrelentingly brutal FromSoftware's newest game was, Fable 2 went in a more co-operative and light-hearted direction with their tracking system.

For whatever reason, Syanna and Steam Library Management Geralt are both able to be physically damaged and hurt by the enemies that appear in this realm, which brings to light questions about how this is possible despite the fact that they aren't actually real and could actually be considered to be illusions, similar to the re

There was nothing quite like getting together with your mates and farting in some uppity noble’s face. Let’s have our dogs antagonize everyone in the village while we taunt them from afar. I loved growing great big demon horns and knocking about Bowerstone with people cowering in fear, not because I was especially dangerous or murdery, but because they knew I was going to be as rude as humanly possible before revelling in their misfortune and legging it off to ruin someone else’s

I don’t reckon this option should be everywhere, either. It would be great for some areas to be exclusively single-player. Maybe we could have a designated PvP arena off in the shithole known as Aurora. The main thing here is that it’s a game designed to be experienced as a single-player narrative that takes partial credence from MMO design, where even when you’re on your own you can feel as if you’re playing something with an active and tangible community. This is nice with Genshin, but it would be particularly brilliant for something like Fable, where everything is just — forgive me for using this usually lazy but in this case especially accurate word — _ fun

  • Share